Global rules for optimal codon choice

In many genomes, presence of some codons in the gene improves the rate and the accuracy of protein translation compared to other synonymous codons for the same amino acid. The identity of these so-called optimal codons varies greatly in evolution and at first glance quite idiosyncratically so. For example, the optimal codon for leucine in Escherichia coli and Drosophila melanogaster is CTG, in Bacillus subtilis TTA, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae TTG, and in Saccharomyces pombe CTT. The rules governing the identities of optimal codons in different organisms remained entirely obscure. In a recent study published in PLoS Genetics Ruth Hershberg and Dmitri Petrov provide as far as we know the first universal set of rules for the choice of optimal codons and also describe a simple model for how the identities of optimal codons can shift in evolution. First we systematically identified the optimal codons of 675 bacteria, 52 archea, and 10 fungi. Using these data, we showed that universally across all bacteria, archea, and fungi the identity of the favored codons tracks the nucleotide content of the genome as a whole. In AT-rich organisms primarily AT-rich codons are optimal. Conversely, GC-rich codons are optimal in the GC-rich organisms. This rule is dominant; however once this rule is taken into account, additional universal amino acid specific rules governing the identity of selectively favored codons became apparent. We used these findings to offer a scenario as to how the identity of optimal codons can shift between genomes by tracking the nucleotide patterns of the genome. Importantly our model does not require even a temporary reduction in the strength of natural selection and is thus prima facie much more plausible that the known alternatives.

The role of transposable elements in evolution

Transposable elements (TEs) are short DNA sequences that can jump around the genome creating new copies of themselves. All this jumping creates many mutations, from subtle regulatory changes to gross genomic rearrangements. In a review just published by Gene, Josefa Gonzalez and Dmitri discuss the role that TE-generated mutations play in adaptation. The potential adaptive significance of TEs was recognized by those involved in their initial discovery, but subsequently TEs were largely considered to be intragenomic parasites leading to almost exclusively detrimental effects to the host genome. The sequencing of the Drosophila melanogaster genome provided an unprecedented opportunity to study TEs and led to the identification of the first TE-induced adaptations in this species. These studies were followed by our systematic genome-wide search that revealed that TEs do contribute substantially to adaptive evolution in D. melanogaster. This study also revealed that there are approximately twice as many TE-induced adaptations that remain to be discovered. To gain better understanding of the adaptive role of TEs in the genome we clearly need to (i) identify as many adaptive TEs as possible in a range of Drosophila species, and (ii) carry out in-depth investigations of the effects of adaptive TEs on as many phenotypes as possible. One such study by Josefa Gonzalez and others was just published by MBE from our lab.